Please share the most important decision points for Pools. Good answers may include hash rate expectations, payout variance, fee structure, block luck, support quality, and the miner's real goals.
I had something similar happen and the fix was much simpler than I expected.
I ran into this after changing pool settings and thought the machine was the problem. In my case the miner was fine, but the network path was unstable and the shares started coming through only after I fixed DNS and restarted cleanly.
For anyone still troubleshooting this, the most useful sequence I found was: confirm the wallet and worker format first, then verify the stratum target, then check miner logs, then look at temperature and uptime, and only after that start changing firmware or network settings. Doing it in a clean order saved me a lot of time because I stopped guessing and started isolating the real problem.
I had a similar situation on a smaller setup and the lesson for me was not to assume profitability or stability from one short test window. Watching behavior over a longer period gave me a more realistic picture.
This is a useful topic because it gives miners the kind of practical detail that is often missing from generic advice.
I think discussions like this are strongest when people share exact setup details, what they tested, and what changed the result.
It also helps to separate theory from real-world miner experience, because many problems only show up under actual load and uptime conditions.
Threads like this can become excellent references when members explain the mistake, the symptoms, and the fix in a structured way.
I appreciate topics like this because they help newer miners avoid expensive errors and give experienced users a place to compare methods.
